<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kelli Dunham &#187; Complaining about state of the world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kellidunham.com/category/complaining-about-state-of-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kellidunham.com</link>
	<description>Everyone&#039;s favorite ex nun, nerdelicious author &#38; comic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:54:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Monster.com is apparently written by idiots</title>
		<link>http://kellidunham.com/2009/11/monster-com-is-apparently-written-by-idiots/</link>
		<comments>http://kellidunham.com/2009/11/monster-com-is-apparently-written-by-idiots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelli  Dunham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Complaining about state of the world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[little black dress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monster.com sucks. anti-feminist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellidunham.com/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[..or was apparently written in 1953.
Last time I posted my resume on monster, I somehow opted in to their Excelle Newsletter which is a career zine for women (get it, &#8220;excel + le&#8221; to feminize it, since excelling isn&#8217;t naturally a feminine quality) and it&#8217;s a real sexist piece of crap.
Their most recent feature was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..or was apparently written in 1953.</p>
<p>Last time I posted my resume on monster, I somehow opted in to their Excelle Newsletter which is a career zine for women (get it, &#8220;excel + le&#8221; to feminize it, since excelling isn&#8217;t naturally a feminine quality) and it&#8217;s a real sexist piece of crap.</p>
<p>Their most recent feature was &#8220;<a href="http://excelle.monster.com/news/articles/2234-10-essentials-every-woman-should-have-in-her-closet?page=1">10 Wardrobe Items Every Woman Should Have</a>&#8221; which is, of course, just an excuse for links to retailers where you can buy those oh so essential items.</p>
<p>Just the same, is this really necessary:</p>
<p><a href="http://kellidunham.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/blackdress.jpg"><img src="http://kellidunham.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/blackdress.jpg" alt="My Bodygards" title="My Bodygards" width="300" height="200" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-389" /></a></p>
<p><em>Item # 5</p>
<p>A closet staple, the “little black dress” should be made of a sturdy but lightweight fabric like a cotton/rayon blend. Avoid heavy wool fabrics that counteract the slimming effects of the color and limit wear during the warmer seasons.</em></p>
<p>Because<br />
1. Women look like this when they are walking across the desert<br />
2. Women are too stupid to know, without coaching, that wool will be too hot to wear during the summer (perhaps this is what motivated the desert illustration?)<br />
3. The whole purpose of the little black dress = slimming.<br />
4. And that&#8217;s really the most important thing for all women.</p>
<p>They also suggest women own <em>one pair of sneakers for working out and also casual activities like shopping.</em><br />
Direct damn quote.</p>
<p>Because that&#8217;s the only activity women really like. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I know lots of women who love a black dress and can totally rock some shopping. But not a single one of them would list &#8220;shopping&#8221; first on their &#8220;casual activity&#8221; lists. </p>
<p>I would understand this from Good Housekeeping or Better Homes and Tighter Vaginas or whatever. But a career website? Really?</p>
<p>And the article had more than 37,000 views so far. I feel like I want to sue Monster for career guidance malpractice. Although I guess technically, promoting stupidity probably isn&#8217;t against any actual laws except for the ones I&#8217;ve written in my head.</p>
<p>Remember, there&#8217;s more likely to be a comment thread on this post at <a href="http://kellidunham.livejournal.com/392006.html">livejournal.com </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kellidunham.com/2009/11/monster-com-is-apparently-written-by-idiots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
